Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 06:32:41 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@FreeBSD.org>, ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option Message-ID: <20150112123241.GB9472@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net> References: <mailman.1.1420977600.74846.freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> <20150111235449.A14AEF52@hub.freebsd.org> <20150112040129.GA16097@lonesome.com> <CAG=rPVcTsT2izsmdGMJtD6RgRJ3CwfZg1vN6nC%2BvRMYEQ8iPhA@mail.gmail.com> <20150112122652.GA9472@lonesome.com> <54B3BE2C.6030207@sorbs.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 01:29:32PM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Just a thought: "FreeNAS" FreeNAS uses ports ... in their own way. Yes, they do contribute back changes as well. The point that I was trying to make, even though I used bad data, was that Ports aren't being driven by external influence. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150112123241.GB9472>