From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Apr 1 09:03:05 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA06456 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:03:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from uswgmn1.uswc.uswest.com (uswgmn1.uswest.com [204.147.87.74]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA06449 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by uswgmn1.uswc.uswest.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) id LAA26466 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:02:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from egate.mnet.uswest.com(151.116.23.138) by uswgmn1.uswc.uswest.com via smap (V1.3) id sma025601; Mon Apr 1 10:31:24 1996 Received: from westhub (westhub.mnet.uswest.com [148.156.21.6]) by egate.mnet.uswest.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id JAA07975 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 1996 09:31:21 -0700 (MST) Received: by westhub.mnet.uswest.com (M-Net Hub.951228) Message-Id: Date: 1 Apr 1996 08:22:54 -0700 From: "Owen Newnan" Subject: tcpdump and ix0 To: "questions about FreeBSD" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP-QM 3.0.2 GM Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I genned up ix0 and bpf; ix0 works fine; and I MAKEDEVed some bpf devices -- but still get "not configured" messages for ix0. Running throught the search engine I came up against the following: From: Gary Palmer >2. I am unable to get the BPF to attach the interface to the Intel >EtherExpress 16 (ix0). /var/log/messages shows attachs for lo0, sl0 >and tun0, but seems to skip ix0. Consequently, tcpdump complains >about ix0. The ix driver doesn't have bpf support AFAIR. ... I'm guessing AFAIR is "as far as I can remember." Is the above (still) the case? Thanks!