From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 27 15:36: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CD937B406 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:35:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36F743FBD for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:35:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 940 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2003 23:35:52 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 27 Feb 2003 23:35:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3E5EA0D8.3080800@liwing.de> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:35:52 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schultz Cc: Doug Barton , Mike Barcroft , current@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure References: <200302272151.h1RLpIWv018756@sparc64.style9.org> <20030227142404.L8428@znfgre.tberna.bet> <20030227232931.GA84770@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Doug Barton : > >>I made the suggestion in another forum that we create subscription lists >>for these tinderbox messages so that those interested could see them, and >>those not interested would not need to filter them out. >> >>Is anyone else interested in doing it that way? Or is this a solution >>looking for a problem? > > > I think most people who track -CURRENT are subscribed to current@ > precisely because they want to know when things break. Similarly > for -STABLE, but that's a moot point because -STABLE doesn't break > very often. For people who don't agree with this, there's always > procmail; the reports aren't all that frequent that filtering is > some sort of burden. I do, however, like the idea of > consolidating them and providing more concise summaries. > I agree. Even sometimes I hate got tinderbox message, in most cases I'm very interested. Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message