From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 9 18:14:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA08240 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 18:14:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA08058; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 18:13:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id SAA26295; Mon, 9 Mar 1998 18:11:56 -0800 (PST) To: Matt Behrens cc: chad@dcfinc.com, "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG, rgrimes@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.5-stable is now in BETA test. In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Mar 1998 20:23:32 EST." Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 18:11:56 -0800 Message-ID: <26292.889495916@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > > Ummm... I probably won't be the only one who asks, "Should that subject > > line reference 2.2.6? > > It's 2.2.5-STABLE until 3.0 moves into STABLE. 2.2.6-RELEASE, sure! > 2.2.6-BETA, maybe. But not 2.2.6-STABLE. (: You're saying that you don't like the branch renaming to 2.2.5-stable? Hmmm. Discuss it with Rod then (cc'd) because it was his idea. :( Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message