Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Apr 2004 21:00:12 +0100
From:      Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To:        Chris Collins <collins@collins-ca.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Installing RAID question.[Scanned]
Message-ID:  <20040428200012.GB41156@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20040428164503.M79217@collins-ca.com>
References:  <20040428125933.M1798@collins-ca.com> <01a301c42d34$3efbdfa0$12c79384@enfield.ac.uk> <20040428164503.M79217@collins-ca.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 12:07:34PM -0500, Chris Collins wrote:
> That is a good tip... I will be sure to "wire down" the new Raid config.=
=20
>=20
> Just one more question... my current setup has ad0s1a for / So ad0 is the=
=20
> physical drive definition(controller) and s1a is the logical partition???=
 and=20
> if I was to add the raid card it might chage to something like this=20
> sc0s1a ??? Is this safe to assume? Sorry just trying to understand how th=
is=20
> all functions...=20
>=20
> This is my current fstab=20
>=20
> /dev/ad0s1b             none            swap    sw              0       0
> /dev/ad0s1a             /               ufs     rw              1       1
> /dev/ad0s1f             /tmp            ufs     rw              2       2
> /dev/ad0s1g             /usr            ufs    =20
> rw,userquota,groupquota         2       2
> /dev/ad0s1e             /var            ufs     rw,userquota    2       2
> /dev/acd0c              /cdrom          cd9660  ro,noauto       0       0
> proc                    /proc           procfs  rw              0       0
>=20
> So my new one would look like this??? if sc0 was the new controller id.
>=20
> /dev/sc0s1b             none            swap    sw              0       0
> /dev/sc0s1a             /               ufs     rw              1       1
> /dev/sc0s1f             /tmp            ufs     rw              2       2
> /dev/sc0s1g             /usr            ufs    =20
> rw,userquota,groupquota         2       2
> /dev/sc0s1e             /var            ufs     rw,userquota    2       2
> /dev/scd0c              /cdrom          cd9660  ro,noauto       0       0
> proc                    /proc           procfs  rw              0       0
>=20

Right -- so you're not just putting in a new raid card, you're moving
your boot drive onto that card as well.

'sc0' won't be the controller ID -- sc is the System Console driver --
but, yes if the raid controller will accept a previously initialised
disk, then the change mapping ad0 onto some other device node as you
show could work.  I wouldn't say that's 100% safe to assume, but
you've a reasonable chance of having that work.

The CD Rom device will however stay at /dev/acd0c

Seeing as you're putting in an ATA Raid card, ignore everything I said
about wiring down device names.  That works for SCSI devices, not
ATA/ATAPI.

The device name 'ad0s1a' breaks down as: ad (ATA Drive) 0 (ie. master
on primary bus), s1 (first slice), a (partition a)=20

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK

--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAkA1MdtESqEQa7a0RAvL/AJ0Q95t+PRO0cTokuio9A3ekwn+UHgCeKUNR
HTdxiE92KxNeRc2uYcdqXk0=
=/G5Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jq0ap7NbKX2Kqbes--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040428200012.GB41156>