From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 26 02:31:11 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7307E106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:31:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erich@apsara.com.sg)
Received: from babylon.webvis.net (babylon.webvis.net [202.157.163.226])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CD88FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from erich@apsara.com.sg)
Received: from [10.0.1.240] ([119.73.191.194]) by apsara.com.sg ;
	Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:31:00 +0800 SGT
From: Erich Dollansky <erich@apsara.com.sg>
Organization: apsara green technology pte ltd
To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:30:56 +0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <4A430505.2020909@gmail.com>
	<200906260955.50697.erich@apsara.com.sg>
	<20090626040230.18f606b1.freebsd@edvax.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090626040230.18f606b1.freebsd@edvax.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906261030.58618.erich@apsara.com.sg>
Cc: bf1783@googlemail.com, Manish Jain <invalid.pointer@gmail.com>,
	freebsd-questions@freebsd.org,
	Erik Osterholm <freebsd-lists-erik@erikosterholm.org>
Subject: Re: The question of moving vi to /bin
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:31:11 -0000

Hi,

On 26 June 2009 am 10:02:30 Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:55:48 +0800, Erich Dollansky 
<erich@apsara.com.sg> wrote:
> > this is not what I mean. I wanted to say, as long as the boot
> > disk come up, I also have /usr available when I have the
> > space to have it all on the same disk.
>
> I see. The fact that /usr isn't available after booting in
> maintenance mode (SUM) is often important for recovery
> purposes. The OS leaves it to the admin to take such important
> decisions. :-)
>
yes, but then he or she knows why certain things on certain places 
unlike those day when it has had to be on those places.

> > Yes, this is the idea of the ideas.
> >
> > But why don't we take Microsoft Word running under wine?
> >
> > I mean, if we strike, we should have a real strike.
>
> That's a very good suggestion. But let's take into mind that we
> do need the most advanced and modern MICROS~1 technology, so
> FreeBSD should include a pirated copy of "Windows 7" in order
> to run the latest and most expensive pirated copy of "Office",
> programmed in Java, running through "Flash". With music. And
> dancing puppies.
>
> If - then real. :-)

Yes, this is the best suggestion up to date.


> Polytropon
> From Magdeburg, Germany

Solltest Du jetzt nicht schlafen?

Hier scheint wenigstens die Sonne.

Erich