From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 12 17:12:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E0416A4CE; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3695443D46; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:12:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j0CHCAOv028673; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:12:10 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j0CHCBTi001864; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:12:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j0CHCBfn001863; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:12:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:12:11 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Simon L. Nielsen" , Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20050112171211.GA1673@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <84dead720501111830323a37b1@mail.gmail.com> <20050112112923.GB81953@ip.net.ua> <20050112121410.GA6704@eddie.nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050112121410.GA6704@eddie.nitro.dk> cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Documenting locking requirements in section 9 manual pages X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:12:14 -0000 On 2005-01-12 13:14, "Simon L. Nielsen" wrote: >On 2005.01.12 13:29:23 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 02:30:19AM +0000, Joseph Koshy wrote: >>> Do we have a standard place in our section 9 manual page format >>> to describe locking requirements of kernel interfaces? >>> >>> What do folks think of a ".Sh LOCKING" section like >>> the existing ".Sh RETURN VALUES"? >> >> I think this is important enough to be worth a separate section. >> Fine with me. Make sure to update share/examples/mdoc/example.9 >> if you go this way. > > Actually we don't have a section 9 example, only 1, 3, and 4. I guess > it should be fairly simple for somebody to make an example.9 based on > one of the other pages. Shamelessly copied from example.3, how does the following look? http://people.freebsd.org/~keramida/example.9 - Giorgos