From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 9 12:09:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E30816A420 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:09:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au [203.6.132.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D9943D48 for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from hoarykde.gihon.org (219-90-239-193.ip.adam.com.au [219.90.239.193]) by cyclone.mail.adnap.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C4B98A9B; Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:39:47 +1030 (CST) From: Brian Astill To: David Newall Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:39:46 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200602091432.44622.bastill@adam.com.au> <43EB0E00.6030503@rebel.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43EB0E00.6030503@rebel.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602092239.46155.bastill@adam.com.au> Cc: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com, freebsd-questions , linuxsa@linuxsa.org.au Subject: Re: Protecting Windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bastill@adam.com.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:09:53 -0000 On Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:10 pm, David Newall wrote: > Brian Astill wrote: > > program runs on Windows 2000/XP only. Why would anyone in their > > right mind NOT port a program as sensible as this to a SECURE OS? > > I should say that Windows XP is not intrinsically insecure. You > can secure it, and I don't mean trivially by removing the network > connection, but by shutting down unneeded services, replacing > iexplorer.exe with firefox where possible, and so on. Yes - that does seem to be a useful possibility. > I have heard > that Dragon Naturally Speaking is very good, and that seems like a > good reason to run Windows. Interesting. The "spiel" on the Nuance website gave me that impression, too. However the Royal Society for the Blind in Adelaide tried v 7 (current is 8) and were VERY unimpressed. -- Regards, Brian