Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:37:43 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Looking for python-pecan Message-ID: <3d402cb1-3084-b808-7cab-d2906891724d@digiware.nl> In-Reply-To: <2A89E91B-464A-40E5-AEB5-AE420EB61D8F@FreeBSD.org> References: <03404c04-5fac-2b2f-4704-0901d052c52f@digiware.nl> <2A89E91B-464A-40E5-AEB5-AE420EB61D8F@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12-6-2017 17:09, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 12 Jun 2017, at 13:29, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> wrote: >> >> For one the Ceph port I'm doing I'm going to need python-pecan in het >> close future. >> >> Not sure how this works with python-modules since it is something that >> is only used by the ceph-ports. But my guess is that I won't be >> able/allowed to just have a post execute like: >> >> ping install python-pecan. > > Normally you would use pip, ping is something entirely different. :) 8-D, yup. Some commands are an automaton. Think P, and ping comes out. > Here is a patch to add a devel/py-pecan port, plus one of its > dependencies that is not yet in the ports tree, devel/py-logutils. > > Tested only very lightly, please take care. It will get tested more now. And now I do not have to make a Pecan port. :) Did you submit this (and py-logutils) for acceptance? --WjW
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3d402cb1-3084-b808-7cab-d2906891724d>