From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 18:57:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D62116A4BF; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3078F43FAF; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:57:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (12-234-22-23.client.attbi.com[12.234.22.23](untrusted sender)) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003091601573301200j0njee>; Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:57:33 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 18:57:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Richard Coleman In-Reply-To: <3F666BCE.6080203@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20030915185643.I13557@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <20030915105356.GA11926@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <3F666BCE.6080203@mindspring.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: tjr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A new sort utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 01:57:35 -0000 On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Richard Coleman wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > At 8:53 PM +1000 9/15/03, Tim Robbins wrote: > > > >> Comments/patches are welcome. As the "History" suggestion > >> of the manual page suggests, my plan is to get this in to > >> FreeBSD 6, along with replacements for some other GNU tools. > > > > Might we put this in freebsd-current (5.x), but under some > > other name? sortbsd, or something? > > Why would you want to do that? Unless the performance difference is > huge, I don't see the problem. > > Since the number of people that really that extra 10% (or whatever) of > speed (for sort) is small, I would suggest the reverse. Replace the > current sort with the BSD licensed version, and move the current one to > a port "gnu-sort", or whatever. This was exactly what I was thinking. Tim, can you mail -arch with this proposal? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection