From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 28 8:18:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E41537B400 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (gemini.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.246.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13CD43E72 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Siegbert.Baude@gmx.de) Received: from lilith (lilith.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de [134.60.106.64]) by mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id g7SFIhaY029612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:18:44 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <00f201c24ea6$32c05b80$406a3c86@whwurm.uniulm.de> From: "Siegbert Baude" To: "C. A. Daelhousen" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions LIST" , "Peter Leftwich" References: <20020826220454.P1757-100000@dhcp-402-55.san.rr.com> <20020827075718.A3273@selvirjin.buffalo.edu> <3D6B82A9.3000904@gmx.de> <20020827170149.C3712@selvirjin.buffalo.edu> Subject: Re: mtools vs mount Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:18:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Chad, >>> in /etc/fstab: >>> /dev/fd0 /floppy msdos rw,noauto,longnames 0 0 >> >> man mount_msdos snippet: > [snip] > > Yes, everyone running FreeBSD has that manpage-- > without its formatting destroyed by cut'n'paste. Sorry for that. Didn't get mutt to work nicely with imap until now. >> And this works: > Obviously it didn't work for the original poster, > or they wouldn't have posted the question. Why it didn't work for the original poster, I don't know, maybe he can answer this. > Note that on a *blank* floppy, no long names are found, so short names > are assumed. So if the archive is put on a blank floppy mounted > short-name in the first place, then no amount of "mount -l"ing later > will recreate the long names. If you would have read the man snippet instead of deleting it, you would have seen, that longname is the default _except_ only short names are already found on the floppy, when mounting it. At least that is my understanding of the man page. > I don't have any bare DOS machines, so I don't ever use short names; > therefore, the longnames option in /etc/fstab is more convenient and > useful. (And it's not in with the -l/-s options in the manpage.) Seems to be a good idea. The only thing is maybe, that you won't be able to read the disk on plain DOS? Sorry, I didn't test this, and it probably doesn't concern many people nowadays. > > If you didn't have anything useful to say to me, don't reply to me. Go > back up the thread for that. If a clarification, including the service of the relevant man snippet in case you can't reach a FBSD machine, where you're reading mails, is a faux-pas in your opinion, I deeply excuse for having done so. BTW, http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=826558+0+current/freebsd-qu estions seems to indicate, that I sent my offending message to Peter Leftwich, just cc-ing C.A. and the list, as I always believed to be good practice on this list, as you never know, which of the participants in a thread are subscribed to the list. Ciao Siegbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message