From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Oct 20 21:24:11 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id VAA02887
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 21:24:11 -0700
Received: from chemserv.umd.edu (chemserv.umd.edu [129.2.64.40])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA02881
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 20 Oct 1995 21:24:09 -0700
Received: from mocha.eng.umd.edu (mocha.eng.umd.edu [129.2.98.16]) by chemserv.umd.edu (8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id AAA17211; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 00:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (chuckr@localhost) by mocha.eng.umd.edu (8.7/8.6.4) id AAA22274; Sat, 21 Oct 1995 00:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 1995 00:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@eng.umd.edu>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com>
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: A quick vote on pthreads PLZ 
In-Reply-To: <199510210416.VAA01397@ref.tfs.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951021002340.22163C@mocha.eng.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 20 Oct 1995, Julian Elischer wrote:

> 
> A/port/package
> or
> B/new base part of the system?
> 
> there will be some changes to libc to make it thread-safe too.
> 
> I vote for B
> 

B also.  You mean kernel threads?

==========================================================================
Chuck Robey chuckr@eng.umd.edu, I run FreeBSD-current on n3lxx + Journey2
 
Three Accounts for the Super-users in the sky,
  Seven for the Operators in their halls of fame,
Nine for Ordinary Users doomed to crie,
  One for the Illegal Cracker with his evil game
In the Domains of Internet where the data lie.
  One Account to rule them all, One Account to watch them,
  One Account to make them all and in the network bind them.