From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 26 23:09:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170EF1AA for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep32.mx.upcmail.net (fep32.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEB2C18 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep32-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20130326230949.UIAE12904.viefep32-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:09:49 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.84.132.32]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id GP9n1l00e0i5fp603P9nn0; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:09:48 +0100 X-SourceIP: 178.84.132.32 Message-ID: <51522ABC.5050403@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 00:09:48 +0100 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Rael Subject: Re: ETA on port of libxml2-2.8.0 References: <5151B721.5030105@lumeta.com> <51522119.9040400@rainbow-runner.nl> <515228E8.6050708@lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <515228E8.6050708@lumeta.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130326-0, 26-03-2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: Jeremy Messenger , gnome@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 23:09:57 -0000 On 27-3-2013 0:02, Patrick Rael wrote: > Thanks Koop for the quick reply. For clarification I followed up > with two questions below. > > -->Pat > --------- > > On 03/26/2013 04:28 PM, Koop Mast wrote: >> On 26-3-2013 16:24, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> I see only libxml2-2.7.8 in freebsd ports. >>>> Do you have an ETA for 2.8.0? >>> I don't, but I will let kwm to answer it. The 2.8.0 breaks API, so it >>> might affects many ports. kwm knows a lot about it, so I will let him >>> to answer more on this. >> >> As far as I know it is only 2.9.0 and up, but I haven't gotten around >> testing it yet. > Do you mean that that only 2.9.0 breaks API, but that you think 2.8.0 > is ok > regarding the API? > 2.8.0 is ok, since that is what people are using when they using ports from MC. > >> >>>> If the ETA is >>>> not before April 4 (that's my deadline), any >>>> ideas/workarounds for me to get 2.8 built? >>> I don't understand your deadline, but I believe that 2.8.0 is >>> available in the MarcusCom CVS. >> >> I will see if I can update libxml2 to 2.8.0 this week, I have some >> other things in the pipe that I really want to commit this week. But >> my poudriere machine is not cooperating .... But like Jeremy said if >> you need it now, you can lift the new version from our devel repo. > > Thanks, if I need to get 2.8.0 from that devel repo, will that work in > our ports tree > so that the ports make will build it? Is that what you mean by it's > available in the devel repo? > Yes, you can treat it as a drop-in replacement for the port version. Devel repo/Marcuscom is where we prepare updates to gnome ports -> http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html > >> >> -Koop >> >>>> Thanks in advance, you folks are wonderful! >>>> >>>> -->Pat >>> >> > >