From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 1 15:50:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C6D16A41F for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B62243D46 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:50:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jA1FoHBI007763 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:50:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jA1FoHXp007762; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:50:17 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:50:17 GMT Message-Id: <200511011550.jA1FoHXp007762@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Tim Bishop Cc: Subject: Re: ports/88250: update misc/dnetc X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Tim Bishop List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 15:50:18 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/88250; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Bishop To: "Andrew P." Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/88250: update misc/dnetc Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:44:16 +0000 On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:39:25PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > On 11/1/05, Tim Bishop wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 07:12:20PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > Please note that PR ports/88250 just has been submitted. > > > > > > The full text of the PR can be found at: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/88250 > > > > What's the reasoning behind removing the INFO file? > > It's an almost exact copy of pkg-descr. I gather the last > thing we want is an unnecessary file in the ports tree. It's installed as info for the user - but pkg-descr could be installed, or maybe nothing at all. Predates me taking over the port. I don't have strong feelings either way, so I'm happy for it to go unless anyone else cares? :-) Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim/ PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984