From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 9 10:56:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3818F16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from hauptpostamt.charite.de (hauptpostamt.charite.de [193.175.66.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D2A43D4C for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:56:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alexander.haderer@charite.de) Received: from postamt1.charite.de (postamt1.charite.de [193.175.66.246]) by hauptpostamt.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B6A15C00D; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from chaplin.charite.de (chaplin.str.charite.de [192.168.202.88]) by postamt1.charite.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEA5633AD; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 19:56:53 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.1.20040309195409.01a90d80@postamt1.charite.de> X-Sender: afrika@postamt1.charite.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 19:57:52 +0100 To: "Shaun T. Erickson" From: Alexander Haderer In-Reply-To: <404E0FE3.5000408@ste-land.com> References: <5.2.0.9.1.20040309192650.01ad49f0@postamt1.charite.de> <404DFE56.6030204@ste-land.com> <404DFE56.6030204@ste-land.com> <5.2.0.9.1.20040309192650.01ad49f0@postamt1.charite.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at charite.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I add a local patch to a port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:56:56 -0000 At 13:41 09.03.2004 -0500, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: >... >Well, cd'ing into the work directory and then into the source directory >and saying: > >patch < patchfile > >correctly patches the file ./dir/file2bepatched > >So, if patchfile is in the files directory, it ough to just work, yes? But >it isn't. Just another guess: Probably it makes a difference if the patchfile patches ./dir/tobepatched and dir/tobepatched. A brief look into other ports shows me that the latter is used. I don't know if it have to be this way or not. Alexander