From owner-freebsd-chat Thu Sep 3 15:50:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA11180 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:50:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.netvision.net.il (alpha.netvision.net.il [194.90.1.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA11138 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:50:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ycs@netvision.net.il) Received: from netvision.net.il (RAS5-p35.hfa.netvision.net.il [62.0.147.35]) by alpha.netvision.net.il (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id BAA14350; Fri, 4 Sep 1998 01:45:21 +0300 (IDT) Message-ID: <35EF1D18.FF4A06B3@netvision.net.il> Date: Fri, 04 Sep 1998 01:50:00 +0300 From: Yoav Cohen-Sivan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b1 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: eivind@yes.no, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better SNR suggestion for the mailing lists References: <35EF0C6D.C3ACAD5F@netvision.net.il> <19980904002302.28650@follo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eivind Eklund wrote: > > The problem with this is the same as requiring subscriptions for > posting at all - a lot of us are subscribed through different accounts > than we post from (I, for instance, am subscribed through my > FreeBSD.ORG account except for the lists where I made a mistake), and > it is not very practical to have to post through those addresses. > I can see two solutions: 1) Resubscribe using your regular posting address. It is an inconvenience, but a small _one-time_ inconvenience to pay for clean lists. 2) Add an option, so that when one subscribes he can list a set of e-mail addresses he'll use for posting. I have no idea how feasible #2 is, it sure sounds like a load on the mailing list server. It seems to me #1 is ideal. Out of curiosity, why would someone consciously subscribe from an address he doesn't use? Do you use aaa@bbb to post, but read from ccc@ddd? How many people do this routinely? > I think a moderated list for architecture discussions is a better way > of handling this, and have thus volunteered to moderate one (I'd like > not to have to, but it seems like the only way to get a really good > list). Now, _that_ is a lot of work. I can't see how everybody suffering a bit from #1 above is worse than slowly driving a couple of moderators crazy ;-) Yoav > > Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message