From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 18:22:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103AF16A4CE; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hudson.icann.org (hudson.icann.org [192.0.35.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4ED43D45; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:22:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@dougbarton.net) Received: from dougbarton.net (g35-097.icann.org [192.0.35.97] (may be forged)) by hudson.icann.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBI2Lsp19905; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:21:55 -0800 Message-ID: <3FE10F42.7030208@dougbarton.net> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 18:21:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergei Kolobov References: <200312162127.hBGLRMUF039206@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031217022824.GA26180@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031217060754.GA714@chetwood.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ICANN-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@icann.org for more information X-ICANN-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports MOVED X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 02:22:17 -0000 Sergei Kolobov wrote: > I have mixed feelings about this myself, however: > - the software refers to itself as "MailScanner", in Perl module name, > all paths and filenames We have some other perl stuff that defies the case sensitive convention, but I don't like that either. :) Also, is this thing a perl module? If so, then there should be a p5- prepended to the port name. THAT convention is well enough engrained to be outside dispute. > - I suggested to the maintainer that PORTNAME should be changed to > MailScanner, in order to make the paths and names consistent with the > software's own naming scheme I think that your advice here was bad. All due respect. The value of having a consistent name space in the ports tree far exceeds the value of consistency with the path names of the installed software. FWIW, Doug