From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 29 01:48:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA05531 for current-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 01:48:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nlsystems.com (nlsys.demon.co.uk [158.152.125.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA05505; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 01:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from herring.nlsystems.com (herring.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.2]) by nlsystems.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA18632; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 09:21:21 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 09:21:21 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Kevin Van Maren , dfr@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD support under current In-Reply-To: <5519.862295542@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > In addition to the config file changes, we've had to change this > > line since at least 2.1.5 for hesiod support: (So maybe change it > > in 2.2 and 2.1 as well?) > > I don't know much about hesiod (never used it) but it sounds good to > me. Doug, are you going to field this? Just trying to make sure it > doesn't go down a crack. I will deal with this. It looks pretty trivial so I can probably put it into current today. Since it is conditional on building AMD with hesiod support, I don't see why I shouldn't put it into the other branches as well. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891