From owner-freebsd-isp Sun May 18 22:41:56 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA04160 for isp-outgoing; Sun, 18 May 1997 22:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phil.digitaladvantage.net (phil.digitaladvantage.net [207.40.157.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA04155 for ; Sun, 18 May 1997 22:41:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stoney.zeeb.mpls.mn.us (spliffman@stoney.zeeb.mpls.mn.us [208.18.129.16]) by phil.digitaladvantage.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA13499 for ; Mon, 19 May 1997 00:37:02 -0500 (CDT) From: rpanula@dacmail.net (Russ Panula) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: radius, usr total control and freebsd Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 00:50:47 -0600 Organization: Digital Advantage Corporation Reply-To: rpanula@dacmail.net Message-ID: <337ff6ac.74168368@mail.digitaladvantage.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99f/32.299 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id WAA04156 Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 16 May 1997, Robert Heron wrote: > > >On Thu, 15 May 1997, spork wrote: > >> If anyone has info on Radius and USR Total Control, I'd love to hear from >> them as well... We just bought a whole bunch of these, and I hate the >> thought of buying a Sparc or NT (yechhhh) machine to run the USR modded >> Radius. > >I have exactly the same problem. We've bought USR Total Control Hub and >would like to manage user's accounts via radius. I've heard from the compay >that had installed our TCH that the only radius server working with USR TCH >is the one from USR. They tried some radius server under Linux, but it didn't >work properly. It really would be very nice to have radius under FreeBSD for >USR TCH and other UNIX systems. I've got a TCH talking to Livingston Radius 1.16 running on a FreeBSD box.. Old, but it works. I think all I did was add some values to the dictionary file. It wasn't that hard...definately not as painful as this thread seems to make the box out to be. I actually (gasp) sorta enjoy working with the box. ..Russ