Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2022 19:18:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 261977] lang/gcc12-devel: enable LTO Message-ID: <bug-261977-29464-b0rSgQpvBS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-261977-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D261977 --- Comment #10 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #7) While I had been referencing a port-specific option, I see there is a USE_LTO=3D available in the infrastructure. I've no clue of the intent. May be use of bootstrap-lto-noplugin vs. bootstrap-debug should repect the status of the USE_LTO? I leave it to someone that knows the intended direction for having optional LTO use as the ports progress --or if there is an intent to have it be optional at all long term. (Even if I consider lack of optionality for LTO being an odd choice when there are notable time or memory tradeoffs.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-261977-29464-b0rSgQpvBS>