From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Jan 26 19:29:36 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA13851
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:29:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.citynet.net (main.citynet.net [206.101.104.67])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA13846
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 19:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aubreyma (beck1_23s.citynet.net [207.0.255.38]) by main.citynet.net (8.7.4/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA14091 for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:29:10 -0500
Message-ID: <32EC2247.3AD3@citynet.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 22:34:31 -0500
From: "Aubrey S. Marshall" <aubreysm@citynet.net>
Organization: Innovations
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: OS2 Warp or FreeBSD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I would like to know why I should choose FreeBSD over OS2 Warp as a
second operating system. I use Win95 as a primary OS because I work with
WIN95 daily, as I am a CE with GE Capital ITS. What and Why?