From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 17 00:01:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5166C1065694 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C7B8FC25 for ; Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24681 invoked by uid 399); 17 Nov 2009 00:01:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 17 Nov 2009 00:01:11 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4B01E7C6.2060305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 16:01:10 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Sandford References: <4AF897A4.3070408@delphij.net> <20091109225232.GA34294@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <4AF9B6CC.5090308@delphij.net> <20091113011000.GA45256@atarininja.org> <20091113200607.GA59749@atarininja.org> <4AFED0D3.2050403@paradisegreen.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4AFED0D3.2050403@paradisegreen.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: svn for make fetch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:01:12 -0000 Thomas Sandford wrote: > If it were just one port and/or just a port maintainers tool I'd agree. > But this is something that affects MULTIPLE ports. You still seem to be advocating the idea of making this a mechanism for users, in spite of the fact that numerous people have said that idea is not likely to ever be approved. Given the universe where this feature is only used by maintainers, a tool script is a good solution. Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/