Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:54:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> Cc: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com>, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: m_getcl and end-to-end performance Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0208201254060.52191-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <15714.40341.115512.786712@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Bosko Milekic writes: > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:36:38PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > > Luigi Rizzo writes: > > > > > > > > now if you have patches i'll be happy to have a look at them. > > > > > > Here's what I'm running with now. It removes the M_PKTHDR > > > requirement, allowing me to use multiple m_getcl()'s to stock jumbo > > > frames. > > > > I forgot about something in Luigi's original patch: > > > > Does this stuff make sure to only stock the pool with mbufs+clusters > > and not mbufs+any_other_external_buffer? This requirement seems to be > > Yes, it checks that M_EXT_WRITABLE(m) is true before adding it to the pool. Are only Cluster mbufs writable? > > Drew > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0208201254060.52191-100000>