From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 10 03:50:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA22973 for current-outgoing; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 03:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.itfs.nsk.su (gw.itfs.nsk.su [193.124.36.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id DAA22953 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 03:50:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from itfs.UUCP (root@localhost) by gw.itfs.nsk.su (8.6.12/8.6.12) with UUCP id RAA17104 for current@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:49:59 +0700 Received: by itfs.nsk.su; Wed, 10 Sep 97 17:50:53 +0700 (NST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by news.itfs.nsk.su (8.7.5/8.6.12) id RAA17657; Wed, 10 Sep 1997 17:44:54 +0700 (NSD) From: nnd@itfs.nsk.su To: current@freebsd.org Subject: PPP - link-up/link-down asymmetry Date: 10 Sep 1997 10:44:52 GMT Message-ID: <5v5tn4$gsa@news.itfs.nsk.su> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk /usr/sbin/ppp searchs 'ppp.linkup' file for labels starting from 'my-ip-address', then looks at 'dstsystem' ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ and finally at 'MYADDR'. On link-down the file 'ppp.linkdown' is searched starting from 'peer-ip-address', then 'dstsystem' and ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ finally to 'MYADDR' labels. Is there any sense in such an asymmetry ? Would'nt it be better to look at both 'my-' and 'peer-ip-address' on both link-up and link-down events ? (But I can'nt put this two adresses in one particular order ;-) N.Dudorov