From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 02:51:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9186C99C; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 22:51:37 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: What we have here, ... Message-ID: <20140615025137.GM1248@hub.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bEAlbH1hodbw2omC" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 02:51:41 -0000 --bEAlbH1hodbw2omC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Is a failure to build head/ with high make(1) -j values. Again. With empty /usr/obj, I have been seeing strange build failures on head/ with high -jN values, but even as low as -j10. The machine used to build snapshots of head/ and stable/ branches has been using -j48 for several months without issue, so I am certain this is a recent (<=1 month) issue. Of all things, it looks like fonts are failing to build, giving the following error: --- MACGUJARATI.esdb --- NAME is mandatory. ENCODING is mandatory. *** [MACGUJARATI.esdb] Error code 1 make[6]: stopped in /usr/src/share/i18n/esdb/APPLE Is anyone else seeing this with empty MAKEOBJDIR ? I won't be able to reproduce the issue with log output until at least Monday, since I'm running the head/ builds with the '-jN' halved to 24, which so far seems to have made a difference. Thanks. Glen --bEAlbH1hodbw2omC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTnQo5AAoJELls3eqvi17QP98QAID2Htbu7+58mKu5shd0Zu5r ZgP1b4RVLmjEZqiX5K6YBfMHVeLjWHEjk3OIEKdGVW2tbnL6mzBVvpy4GkYTMRa9 ty7h/F1HfOBrBK+T/0cHA6O2lZgB/AYwmK+tfkmz47xK8GmWVj3N1bjuTKAsU9sG CogZju1EHOYoQcE0Sericg84oHLTb8wJb6oIslApWiGb26lfxhCxBiw0LZGkPAfl hzMZr6/p3Mh6udkdXE2l5GMqKk9vjtGTNAtiM0Kw7I60G9Gqla7R2ep6/+mVUxHH ii/Jxq49NRRXRwhMHPFhD5A5BSiLvT4wAqWEKdLCLfQhAYie8AQt8rz2a/pOl909 yj9FgQs1v0R1t+XKahJ/ZfLkD7rFsbqG4OuOln0wTkBtpfcBXF1KKaDegZvL+jk3 /I5soC+O+9VsSsNr2WeosqUhB8ElYtML9POKnZzvY4jII2b0nLHoNhtSyl0+blmG 12jqGezbi88jvxFNVItgy0p/NjnKkRrzP/iRV9KZEKBZ8xSlzHcimsWA2cQnjLlj 6z7TLFq9wQ36G0OiQNy6kuRukiwbjYZjMg7GsuF2d+IR0lorOj1fL6Z8RREkdvB6 s9fZUQ5FerghE3+HvXA6XIwvTVDmEGwNSGYC5mAYHPu7CV09i5Q6OLfBjG+gVuRb OX+C/y3mbMlKksGW8975 =mBHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bEAlbH1hodbw2omC--