From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jun 16 13:06:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA10043 for questions-outgoing; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA10030 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA21391 for ; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 13:05:49 -0700 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-1) with ESMTP id QAA21698; Sun, 16 Jun 1996 16:23:37 +0100 (BST) To: Sean Batson cc: Terry Lambert , questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: defrags In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Jun 1996 05:53:29 EDT." Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1996 16:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: <21696.834938615@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sean Batson wrote in message ID : > You guys said I shouldn't worry about the 0.7% but its now > 0.9% and increasing each time I shutdown the software down > and restart. This is because you are using more disk space, no doubt ... I REALLY wouldn't worry. I think you are getting confused between DOS fragmentation and FFS fragmentation ... Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info