From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 13:51:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918F716A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:51:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes03-hme0.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC3443FB1 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:51:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from viktorlazlo@telus.net) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (really [66.183.123.52]) by priv-edtnes03-hme0.telusplanet.netESMTP <20031119215110.EUJZ7077.priv-edtnes03-hme0.telusplanet.net@[192.168.1.101]>; Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:51:10 -0700 Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 13:51:08 -0800 (PST) From: Viktor Lazlo X-X-Sender: viktorlazlo@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net To: Lawrence Sica In-Reply-To: <99E31C70-1AD6-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2@mac.com> Message-ID: <20031119133124.A3269@d66-183-123-52.bchsia.telus.net> References: <23740.216.195.235.103.1069277586.squirrel@webmail.gigguardian.com> <99E31C70-1AD6-11D8-9E07-000393A335A2@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO Lawsuits, round 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 21:51:11 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Lawrence Sica wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2003, at 4:33 PM, Chip McClure wrote: > > > Anyone happen to have a look at Slashdot recently? Happen to wander > > across > > an article on the next round of lawsuits, targetting the BSD community. > > > > IMO, SCO's grabbing at straws, and they're sinking fast. > > > > http://www.newsforge.com/business/03/11/18/1742216.shtml? > > tid=2&tid=82&tid=85&tid=94 > > > > > I'm no lawyer, but I don't see how much hope SCO has. The lawsuit was > settled and alll... Settled out of court though, which means there was no legal resolution, giving them some potential, although unlikely, room for leverage. Cheers, Viktor