From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 22 19:25:31 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA06280 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:25:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nike.efn.org (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.28]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA06237 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nike.efn.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA27113 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 19:25:23 -0700 (PDT) From: John-Mark Gurney X-Sender: gurney_j@nike Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney To: freebsd-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: question about includes in ports Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I'm just wondering if this is a bug or just a problem on running an outdated system with current ports... I reciently upgraded to 0801-SNAP... and am now building ports/print/ghostscript4... the problem that I ran into was that I had installed libz back when it was a port and libz still isn't a part of 0801-SNAP... because of this the zlib.h is in /usr/local/include and not /usr/include... the makefile for ghostscript4 assumes no extra include directories... my fix was to edit /etc/make.conf and add -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS= line... is this the right fix? or should the ports be fixed? just wondering and thanks for your input... ttyl... John-Mark gurney_j@efn.org http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ Modem/FAX: (541) 683-6954 (FreeBSD Box) Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD (unix)