Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 21:01:21 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-share@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/doc/handbook policies.sgml Message-ID: <199703301301.VAA08481@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Mar 1997 01:55:13 PST." <199703300955.BAA17852@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David E. O'Brien" wrote: [..] > As pointed out by Bruce there are *three* different filenames being used: > > cvs FREEBSD.README > groff FREEBSD-upgrade > libgmp FREEBSD-upgrade > libpcap FREEBSD-upgrade > tcpdump FREEBSD-upgrade > traceroute FREEBSD-upgrade > tcl README.FreeBSD > > The handbook states "README.FreeBSD". Perhaps this should be changed? IMHO, The big problem with README.FreeBSD is that it's not uncommon to see vendors shipping README files for particular OS's, and it's not unreasonable to expect that there could be README.FreeBSD's around there from vendors. It also blends in with the vendor files too well. I'd have preferred them to be up a directory level out of the vendor files altogether.. (eg: src/contrib/cvs/* and src/contrib/cvs.README) Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703301301.VAA08481>