Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 04:31:51 -0800 (PST) From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> To: Camson.Huynh@eBioinformatics.com (Camson Huynh) Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bridge + ipfw Message-ID: <200011281231.eASCVpN47491@iguana.aciri.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10011282256240.17236-100000@shad.au.int.en-bio.com> from Camson Huynh at "Nov 28, 2000 11: 8:16 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The above doesn't explain why everything work under ne2000 cards but not intel
> etherexpress pro 100. Same set of rules allow arp entries through ne2000 cards
> but not intel. Also from /etc/rc.firewall that came with FreeBSD 4.2:
> # If you're using 'options BRIDGE', uncomment the following line to pass ARP
> #${fwcmd} add 300 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0
> which I've done. Unless the rc.firewall file is out of date. My set of rules
it is out of date, yes. that command does not have the special
meaning anymore.
sure it does not explain why ne2000 work and fxp do not, but from
the symptoms i really suspect some ipfw misconfiguration rather
than a problem in the operating system
luigi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011281231.eASCVpN47491>