From owner-freebsd-chat Sun May 26 23:11:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08F837B421 for ; Sun, 26 May 2002 23:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pool0387.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.199.132] helo=mindspring.com) by avocet.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17CDim-0003JU-00; Sun, 26 May 2002 23:11:09 -0700 Message-ID: <3CF1CDD7.A210BF97@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 23:10:31 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgreen Cc: Rahul Siddharthan , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Language in danger: Language loss References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org pgreen wrote: > Well, you have to think counter-unpartisanly. For example, using > Ruminov's Ruminition, you can think of any idea, regardless of > linguistical barriers. For example, let's say an Episcipitalian wishes to > know how to know. By using Ruminov's Ruminition, he is able to: A) Think, > purely using emotions, a language inate in any human, of the > children. B) This, of course, leads to only one conclusion: 1) Anything > can be known, in the context of one's reality. > > Thus, we see how anything can be thunk, regardeless of any so-called > language. So your hypothesis is that emotions constitute a Turing-complete language? -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message