From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:23:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910DA106567A; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3288FC25; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SFMpHZ027218; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:23:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <201202280846.08966.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:23:27 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <14F8E8BB-F952-431E-B1DB-E171D87293AE@samsco.org> References: <4F26CC5A.2070501@FreeBSD.org> <4F4C0600.2000903@FreeBSD.org> <3BA1B476-ED05-4E8E-8DFA-0B06EFB48867@samsco.org> <201202280846.08966.jhb@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-50.0 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Devin Teske , Andriy Gapon Subject: Re: revisiting tunables under Safe Mode menu option X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:23:29 -0000 On Feb 28, 2012, at 6:46 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 1:23:11 am Scott Long wrote: >> I still think that it's useful to be able to disable ACPI. Just = because=20 > ACPI works well on modern hardware doesn't mean that everything crummy = from=20 > 2000-2007 suddenly disappeared off the face of the earth. But I agree = that=20 > turning it off on modern systems probably does more harm than good. = Hence my=20 > suggestion for a finer control over this in the menu. Maybe Devin = Teske can=20 > lend some help with this task? For extra credit, it should be = possible to=20 > write a simple static analysis tool that collects all of the tunables = that are=20 > compiled into the kernel and generates a data file that the boot menu = can=20 > process and turn into interactive knobs for the user. >=20 > Hmm, with the newer boot menu, can't one now toggle safe mode and ACPI=20= > independently? (Assuming we haven't removed the ability to disable = ACPI from=20 > the menu, if we have we should perhaps put that back). Having them be=20= > orthogonal knobs would seem to the be the best approach. >=20 Yes, Andriy reminded me of this last night, so I withdraw my comments. Scott