From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 08:31:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B1516A4D0 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 802D143D31 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i37FUObv098148 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i37FUOtN098147; Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404071530.i37FUOtN098147@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Timur I. Bakeyev" List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 15:31:36 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/64523; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" To: Michael Nottebrock , freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, timur@com.bat.ru Cc: Subject: Re: ports/64523: Make samba-libsmbclient subport of samba-devel Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2004 17:22:49 +0200 On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 15:21:36 +0200 Michael Nottebrock wrote: >There are still issues here: > >1.) samba-devel and samba-libsmbclient still conflict >with each other, which >doesn't make sense. Having a client library installed >must not prevent people >from installing the server. This is quite compleax question, on my opinion. The problem with current approach is that samba-libsmbclient installs the most simplistic version of library, bare bones, I'd say. In a sofisticated environment it should get linked against at least LDAP and Kerberos libraries, to get wide range of ways of authentication. Well, I'm not sure here, would it use them or not... > Instead, samba-devel should >depend on >samba-libsmbclient and never install the library by >itself. My point to keep libsmbclient in samba-devel is the one, mentioned above, plus expences of double compilation of samba tree, which isn't so small. If everyone(who depend on libsmbclient) thinks it's ok, we can get rid of client library from samba-devel. >2.) The slave port has stylebugs (see ports/64393). Hm.. I've looked over the whole PR and didn't find anything, in the slave port, that conflicts with the statements there. Contrary, samba-devel itself has problems with style and doesn't validate by portlint(but thats a separate issue, that involves OPTIONS and structure of bsd.ports.mk). Can you point me, what's wrong with the slave port on your opinion? Oh, and thanks for the patch for samba-devel! With regards, Timur.