From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 7 23:34:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D266516A41A; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F3D13C4CC; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m17NSP7O093272; Thu, 7 Feb 2008 16:28:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:31:09 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20080207.163109.-1384053103.imp@bsdimp.com> To: attilio@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yar@freebsd.org, dougb@freebsd.org, jeff@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, swhetzel@gmail.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:34:24 -0000 In message: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> "Attilio Rao" writes: : - Do you use NTFS? : - Are you interested in maintaining it? : - Do you know a good reason to not use FUSE ntfs implementation? What : the kernel counter part adds? : - Do you think axing the kernel support a good idea? I use NTFS extensively and it has worked as recently as early in the 7.0 release branch. I think axing it is a horrible idea. Warner