From owner-freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 7 06:49:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F9D5F53; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:49:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from felyko.com (felyko.com [174.136.100.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288F016D9; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 06:49:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (c-24-6-115-18.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.115.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by felyko.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8351239827; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:49:19 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [CFT] Update to clang 3.4 From: Rui Paulo In-Reply-To: <29C2D69E-9EC8-418D-A333-FC1A8DA2133B@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 22:49:18 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <541C998A-071A-4917-9D91-DD00CB0E2689@FreeBSD.org> <29C2D69E-9EC8-418D-A333-FC1A8DA2133B@FreeBSD.org> To: Dimitry Andric X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 06:49:27 -0000 On 5 Jan 2014, at 05:00, Dimitry Andric wrote: > I need some assistance with this, from somebody who knows exactly how > CTF and DTrace work together. Our CTF tools use libdwarf in base, = which > is also quite old, and seems to be largely unmaintained. It does not > seem to support anything beyond DWARF2. I think it would be = worthwhile > to upgrade this library from upstream ASAP. Our libdwarf was a from scratch implementation and we never used the = LGPL libdwarf. I don't know if it's worth investing time upgrading our = BSD licenced libdwarf or importing the LGPL libdwarf. Given the push to = keep the tree mostly BSD licenced, I would say the former. -- Rui Paulo