From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jul 15 14:26:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA17611 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 14:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA17597; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 14:26:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA03212; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 14:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199607152125.OAA03212@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 To: Narvi cc: dyson@freebsd.org, winter@jurai.net, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I ask you to respond to Linus In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jul 1996 00:20:35 +0300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 14:25:41 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >From The Desk Of Narvi : > Hmmm... That damn latency... How abou asking them for tcpblast results? > Perhaps there are some serious problems with their code that they use the > results of just one benchmark? > > Sander Who knows what the real reason is . However one can imply that the linux crowd wants us to do the analysis for them 8) Regards, Amancio