Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:54:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gandalf The White <gandalf@digital.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the Rose Attack / NewDawn Message-ID: <20050511205216.Q3724@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <52F4D230-9D2D-4D75-93DC-FF54BB902D98@FreeBSD.org> References: <BEA2382D.1B2B2%gandalf@digital.net> <52F4D230-9D2D-4D75-93DC-FF54BB902D98@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 May 2005, Suleiman Souhlal wrote: > The patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/ > ip_reass-20050507.diff does just this. > Could you kindly test it? > > Bye, > -- > Suleiman Souhlal | ssouhlal@vt.edu Your patch looks like it would defeat newdawn4, but it's not general enough to optimize for other possible attacks. I'll take a stab at implementing a more general solution tomorrow. Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050511205216.Q3724>