From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Mar 14 02:25:47 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA15746
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:25:47 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA15741
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:25:45 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA07790;
	Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:24:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: binutils bloat 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 14 Mar 1998 14:11:49 +1100."
             <199803140311.OAA16205@cimlogic.com.au> 
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 02:24:21 -0800
Message-ID: <7786.889871061@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Are people going to object if we keep _all_ the binutils source in
> src/contrib/binutils so that we can define a few things in /etc/make.conf
> and get cross tools out of a `make world'?

I think many would object if it were otherwise. :-)

						Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message