From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 07:34:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F68F106566B for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Christopher.Illies@ki.se) Received: from smtp6.ki.se (smtp6.ki.se [130.237.98.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138048FC14 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 07:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from KIMSX12.user.ki.se (kimsx12.user.ki.se [130.229.20.29]) by smtp6.ki.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECE3D4F9A; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from KIMSXCLU01.user.ki.se ([fe80::5934:e0d5:1ab1:4cec]) by KIMSX12.user.ki.se ([fe80::38d2:3ad1:d952:430%16]) with mapi; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:47 +0100 From: Christopher Illies To: Matthew Seaman Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:34:47 +0100 Thread-Topic: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl Thread-Index: Act3e8dvRFExpF15QZuOE7SQ7VWkqQCGJg+s Message-ID: References: <4CC98291.8000609@bah.homeip.net> <4CC9E9A9.2090105@unsane.co.uk> <4CCABB82.9080504@unsane.co.uk> , <4CCAE43F.5050607@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CCAE43F.5050607@infracaninophile.co.uk> Accept-Language: en-US, sv-SE Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US, sv-SE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Vincent, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Hoffman Subject: RE: Sendmail as client via smarthost and ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:34:50 -0000 >GSSAPI is the "Generic Security Services Application Program Interface" >and NTLM is "NT Lan Manager" -- they are both authentication systems >popular amongst various generations of Microsoft OSes. GSSAPI is >actually based on that old Unix stalwart: Kerberos, and hence is also >fairly popular amongst non-Microsoft types. They are some of the >authentication mechanisms that come as standard with SASL implementations. > >Unless you know that you do need them, you almost certainly don't. =20 <...> Thanks your for the explanation. I was actually not sure whether or not these options were needed. Authentication to the smarthost did not work, and at one point I noticed the line: <...> 250-AUTH GSSAPI NTLM <...> coming from the server. So I gave it a try - and it still did not work. Christopher