From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 4 00:57:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8052106566C for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emaste@freebsd.org) Received: from mail2.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8816D8FC17 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 00:57:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com ([192.168.3.11]) by mail2.sandvine.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 3 May 2010 20:45:56 -0400 Received: by labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com (Postfix, from userid 10332) id 432CB1160B; Mon, 3 May 2010 20:45:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:45:56 -0400 From: Ed Maste To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100504004556.GA59830@sandvine.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ed Maste , current@freebsd.org References: <4BDCE05A.5020307@FreeBSD.org> <20100502.073857.74726756.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20100503140438.262539xlm87yp0ao@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100503.151903.74740368.sthaug@nethelp.no> <4BDF5D15.5040207@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BDF5D15.5040207@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 May 2010 00:45:56.0383 (UTC) FILETIME=[282BEAF0:01CAEB23] Cc: Subject: Re: SUJ update X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 00:57:59 -0000 On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:32:37PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I also don't want to bikeshed this to death. I imagine that once the > feature is stable that users will just twiddle it once and then leave it > alone, or it will be set at install time and then not twiddled at all. :) Speaking of which, is there any reason for us not to support enabling SU+J at newfs time? (Other than just needing a clean way to share the code between tunefs and newfs.) -Ed