From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 29 12:26:02 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BA4B16A404 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:26:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from illusion.skoberne.net (illusion.skoberne.net [84.255.205.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 171EB13C45A for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nejc@skoberne.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by illusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710EEB830; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:26:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from illusion.skoberne.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (illusion.skoberne.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92656-08; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.12.4] (unknown [192.168.12.4]) by illusion.skoberne.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8378B827; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <460BB04B.7060907@skoberne.net> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:25:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TmVqYyDFoGtvYmVybmU=?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras , User Questions References: <46090C34.6000205@skoberne.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD on IBM Blade HS21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:26:02 -0000 Hello, > Try waiting about 30 minutes, there was a nasty timeout problem here > when I tried it - you might have the same. Google for my posts on > freebsd-stable mailing list. Okay, it really seems it's the "nasty timeout" I am facing (I booted into the "verbose mode" and it's the controller which causes the waits). I have tried to find that thread but wasn't really successful. Did you manage to get rid of the timeout after all? Thanks, Nejc