From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 29 01:51:59 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 4A260430; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:51:59 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Alex Kozlov <ak@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r307899 - head/benchmarks/super-smack
Message-ID: <20121129015159.GB11624@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201211281109.qASB9dPm010874@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20121128115359.GA53862@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121128130417.GA31569@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
 <20121128160825.GB53862@FreeBSD.org>
 <20121128200920.GA41552@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121128200920.GA41552@ravenloft.kiev.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:51:59 -0000

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:09:20PM +0200, Alex Kozlov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:08:25PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > They are essentially the same modulo "enable" word, which was decided to
> > remove some time ago.  In fact, "generic" descriptions are better since they
> > mention that is it *database* support.  Doug removed the word "support" in
> > r305288, which many folks disagree with, but it will be backed out one we
> > will have dialog4ports committed, which will allow proper support for
> > checklists and radiobuttons.  You can leave them now, but after r305288 will
> > be backed out, I will ask you again to drop them.
> > 
> Will do, my point was that 'MySQL support' is better than 'MySQL database'.

Yes, I agree, I also very much miss "support" word.  :-)

> > It is not technically obsolete; sometimes it is the only attribution we
> > can provide.  If there is actual WWW page, it should be dropped.
> 
> It looks not hard to implement. Is it documented somewhere?

Not sure, probably not.  pkg-descr was always kinda gray area, since most
people do not really care how does it look (or do they look).  So I think
there are no firm standards.  I would suggest use your best judgment and
sense of aesthetics.  It's good that at least recently we seem to have
consensus on preferring space to tab after WWW: (and similar) lines.

> Thanks for your reviews.

Thank *you* for accepting them.

./danfe