From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 22 18:02:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28818AE4 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:02:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gtodd@wawanesa.iciti.ca) Received: from mailout.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [64.68.200.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB3598FC12 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593BDE000 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:55:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mailout.easydns.com Received: from mailout.easydns.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailout.easydns.vpn [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HA0Dryy2vBqQ for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wawanesa.iciti.ca (CPE0080c8f208a5-CM001371173cf8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.246.61.82]) by mailout.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7FB12E03D for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:55:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 63255 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2012 13:54:34 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO wawanesa.iciti.ca) (192.168.2.4) by wawanesa.iciti.ca with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2012 13:54:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 13:54:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Graham Todd To: "C. P. Ghost" Subject: Re: MPSAFE VFS -- update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: attilio@freebsd.org, FreeBSD FS , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov , Peter Holm X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:02:00 -0000 On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Attilio Rao wrote: >> Following the plan reported here: >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS >> >> We are now at the state where all non-MPSAFE filesystems are >> disconnected by the three. > > Sad to see PortalFS go. You've served us well here. :-( It is kinda neat. How do/did you use it? portalfs seems to have around a 10th of the LoC than MSDosFS and the changes made to make MSDosFS MPSAFE are documented on the above page: is it just that portalfs is too obscure to have a maintainer? Thanks to all for the work on MPSAFE-ty ;-)