From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr  1 09:39:50 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA21906 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 09:39:50 -0800
Received: from ix2.ix.netcom.com (ix2.ix.netcom.com [199.182.120.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA21900 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 09:39:49 -0800
Received: from  by ix2.ix.netcom.com (8.6.12/SMI-4.1/Netcom)
	id JAA06143; Sat, 1 Apr 1995 09:36:32 -0800
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 1995 09:36:32 -0800
Message-Id: <199504011736.JAA06143@ix2.ix.netcom.com>
From: PVinci@ix.netcom.com (Paul Vinciguerra)
Subject: Why to use HTTPD for 2.1
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I think that HTTPD *SHOULD* be part of 2.1...

1.	keep the man pages and use one of the man2html packages floating 
around.  This way poeple get both with no muss.

2.	It's ideal for managing the ports/packages... have a port.html 
or package.html with each package/port that explains each with an 
"install" option that would do the installation.

3.	include the modified HTTPD which allows for aliased hosts.  I 
think that this alone will make freeBSD the os of choice for all ISP's.

Paul