From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 12 13:57:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F123155DC for ; Wed, 12 May 1999 13:57:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA12011; Wed, 12 May 1999 13:57:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:57:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Kenneth Woo Cc: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: y2k compliance version In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 11 May 1999, Kenneth Woo wrote: > This message bounced for the bugs address. Could you forward or > answer the question? > > ---------- > From: Kenneth Woo > Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 1999 12:51 PM > To: 'freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG' > > I have been reading you statement for the y2k compliance, the question > that I have is, which version of FreeBSD has all the fixes > incorporated? They should be in 3.1 and later. Doug White Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message