From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Fri May 27 20:30:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5425EB4D088 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464491F27; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BF310B6; Fri, 27 May 2016 20:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:30:30 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Ben Woods Cc: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 11 code slush breaks PkgBase package versioning Message-ID: <20160527203030.GG4025@FreeBSD.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 20:30:31 -0000 --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:26:22PM +0200, Ben Woods wrote: > Hi everyone, >=20 > I just re-built my FreeBSD 11 base packages, and it seems that as of the > FreeBSD 11 code slush in r300813 the packages now have version 11.0 inste= ad > of the datestamp. This is obviously wrong, and if anything maybe they > should have 11.0-alpha1. > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D300813 >=20 > Thoughts? >=20 You are correct. I'll fix this in a few moments. This is caused by the 'packages' target looking only for 'STABLE' or 'CURRENT'. Thank you for the report. Glen --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSK5mAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KT7eYP/RE7Q0As8u/KrCAn8hBSjBJL PJg5/rSCYj0EGuhmMLbsS+zvzQXSGtk9bbeWylt3Tm29GpefPONShDZBTgDzi5R3 TDW0SaE/UF6Onsq0A3iDUpExhDx4Xd+j4ykicMU6Xh8Dm/5HhlBuSHiT8YjK187Y 0YO9FbBttp2GKGaaHfmcvfcQNqt8kWwDm7qkHlRfmLNLCJOIYd95q2kSBxHA1v8O 2P58ZbeVcB1g5OncP1WIAmGX7gUltMVpkWCinLqCRsBAoe+ps0KMPb2/kSE5wpxa R8TIBafduEn+jo4QboH3EmSKosRtbOabYV1mf44Cw7VpMMH3gKC3rCYW/l1u7xRb 2llq2H3Jcet9q0n8BrvCe4nyzs2XVj1pF8Vu5PZHFFXq1PONaNdQOhZXyLsdkB5p UlIm12ONp5uiaHcY9xMLPSWGDzPGqjnu54n2DMh86IJYcFQ/ie6cijRedJOD26Pq mBi0tvm5QGpSV+EyxD8tbKRApz4QZLk0syhYxjW4RWPU8siqvJweFbv4GcGR0HHO HtvVZhQnmwXQfSyaNcP3/GMUHq8D8t7TVuWskVX1nw7CU5/Ip6WjhqSuQKeKROWR bIrGzKC9BaG/+S/ne6CbIwUNR19VaTawBUSmgjYK/teLQFYXsVZ216PgN1u6059T ZwC5l6+PNyEEoWjb0eHw =RlaL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kjpMrWxdCilgNbo1--