From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 27 21:45:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D7337B401 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:45:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13402.mail.yahoo.com (web13402.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3194E43F75 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2003 21:45:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030728044520.4583.qmail@web13402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.91.194.208] by web13402.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:45:20 BST Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 05:45:20 +0100 (BST) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable choose of ghostscript interpreter X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 04:45:20 -0000 Hi; Excuse me if I'm naive, but instead of patching all the ports that use ghostscript, it would be better to have something like USE_GHOSTSCRIPT= yes It would just check if either ghostscript port is installed. cheers, Pedro. ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/