Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:44:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: DPS Initial Ideas Message-ID: <20070513214426.GA64291@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <464785A2.8090001@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20070512004209.GA12218@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <17989.8202.624522.136573@bhuda.mired.org> <20070512090935.GA13929@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20070512193302.GA24673@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070512214422.GA88480@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <20070512222435.GA28981@xor.obsecurity.org> <4646C249.6070103@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20070513084404.GA35648@xor.obsecurity.org> <4646F084.3080601@infracaninophile.co.uk> <464785A2.8090001@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:39:46PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > I can certainly add a check for duplicate PKGNAME and emit warnings. In > > order to be sure of getting the canonical INDEX-N you'ld need a system > > with no ports installed. Well, other than p5-FreeBSD-Portindex and > > dependencies -- none of which suffer from this problem. > > Hmmm, well, I have the first cut at this now. As an added bonus, it > enforces having the port mentioned in the $SUBDIR variable of the > category Makefile before it will add it to the INDEX[*]. > > Turns out there are at least 6 ports present in the tree but not hooked > up in that way: > > happy-idiot-talk:/tmp:% portindex -o INDEX.m |& grep 'not referenced' > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/emulators/linux-vmware-toolbox6 is not referenced from the /usr/ports/emulators category -- not added to INDEX > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/emulators/vmware-guestd6 is not referenced from the /usr/ports/emulators category -- not added to INDEX > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/net-mgmt/nipper is not referenced from the /usr/ports/net-mgmt category -- not added to INDEX > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/net/asterisk12-app-ldap is not referenced from the /usr/ports/net category -- not added to INDEX > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXfont is not referenced from the /usr/ports/x11-fonts category -- not added to INDEX > FreeBSD::Portindex::Tree:printindex(): /usr/ports/x11-fonts/xfs is not referenced from the /usr/ports/x11-fonts category -- not added to INDEX I think they're all repo-copies in progress, and should indeed not appear in the index yet. > as well as a number of duplicate PKGNAMEs -- mostly to do with A4 vs > letter paper size. What I would like is for the incrementally built index to be identical to the 'make index' version, or at least up to cosmetic differences that I can post-process away automatically. Then I can set up a comparison that validates the incremental index over a period of time to look for remaining corner cases where it gets out of sync. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070513214426.GA64291>