From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Jan 25 23:34:25 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA15431
          for bugs-outgoing; Thu, 25 Jan 1996 23:34:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ra.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (ra.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de [134.169.246.34])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA15414
          Thu, 25 Jan 1996 23:34:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from achill [134.169.34.18] by ra.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.6.10/tubsibr) with ESMTP id IAA01706; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:33:40 +0100
Received: from petri@localhost by achill.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de (8.6.10/tubsibr) id IAA00914; Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:33:39 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 08:33:39 +0100
From: Stefan Petri <petri@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
Message-Id: <199601260733.IAA00914@achill.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>
To: FreeBSD-gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, ylo@trance.olari.clinet.fi
CC: freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Tatu Ylonen's message of Thu, 25 Jan 1996 15:20:14 -0800 (PST) <199601252320.PAA16660@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: kern/971: Default limits for number of processes per user ridiculously low
Reply-to: petri@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

Hi!

Tatu>		Make the default soft limit grow with maxusers.

IMHO those two numbers are sufficiently unrelated to not use that
method. _If_ you really need 100 users with 1000 processes each, you
can still set it in some global init file (xdm/Xsession or
/etc/profile or whatever).


							Stefan