From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 21 01:04:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA06372 for current-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 01:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seabass.progroup.com (catfish.progroup.com [206.24.122.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id BAA06363 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 01:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from craig@localhost) by seabass.progroup.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id BAA13152 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 21 May 1996 01:04:53 -0700 Message-Id: <199605210804.BAA13152@seabass.progroup.com> Subject: Re: Solaris x86 +++ To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 01:04:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Craig Shaver" In-Reply-To: <199605202109.RAA17638@diego.isds.duke.edu> from "Andrew Gallatin" at May 20, 96 05:09:10 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > > Jake Hamby writes: > > > switched me back to FreeBSD for good. My plan now is to try to bring in > > Solaris/ELF support (possibly from NetBSD) so that I can run all the > > Solaris "goodies" like ksh, Openwindows tools, Motif, and CDE (that, along > > with the fact that I do Solaris/SPARC development at work/school, was the > > main reason I bought Solaris/x86 [at educational discount] in the first > > place). > > > For quite similar reasons, Solaris/x86 compatibility is something that > I'd like to see happen & help with as well. Is there any ongoing work > in progress on Solaris/x86 compat mode that I could help with? > > Drew > I have both FreeBSD and Solaris 2.(45) x86 running on my little net and would be able to help with some small stuff. Porting, testing, etc.... -- Craig Shaver (craig@progroup.com) (415)390-0654 Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA 94088